2009-03-22

My Conception of God

Being of scientific bent, I am quite uncomfortable with the word "God" as it is frequently bantered about carelessly by dogmatic religious traditions. Indeed, this discomfort was so great that at one point I had dismissed the concept of god as useless. Today, however, I have found a conception of "God" with which I am comfortable: God is nothing more than the anthropomorphization of one's personal conception of "goodness". Obviously, one's personal conception will be greatly influenced through the repeated lessons of parents and other authority figures.

Indeed, due to dogmatic religious and legal traditions, people may incorrectly reason that their conceptions of god are so similar to that of their neighbors because god is universal.

Looking at the variety of ideas of god (I prefer lower case) and god's will it is obvious to me that what most people refer to "god", they do not realize that this god voice that they hear is internal and not external. This apparent externality may be the result of frontal lobe often giving inhibitions of behaviors that are encouraged/rewarded by the rest of our mental faculties. Much of our mental angst arises from the competition between these brain centers.

While the concept of god is an imperfect one, so is that of self, ego, gravity or other concepts. That does not make god unreal, but simply an imperfect concept like so many other useful, but imperfect concepts. Most of the attacks on god are justifiable attacks on conceptions of god that are the result of an unreflective minds; however, the concept that I put forward is pretty much unassailable.

One may of course argue that the personification of goodness adds nothing to its understanding; however, that is partly due to the preference for saying that our physical brains control our ideas, when in reality our internalized ideas can control our behavior.

2006-03-31

Oh, Arrogant One

Your ideas seem highly improbable and highly arrogant:
  • You are at the center of the universe?
  • The sun and stars revolve around you.
  • Your group is the greatest and most moral on your planet.
  • An omnipotent power 
    • created your species in his image
    • speaks directly to you
    • created everything else for the benefit of your species.
    • is preoccupied with your actions
    • always favors your side in battle.
    • will only save other who share your beliefs

2006-01-07

Shindler's List

The German-American woman said it was terrible if it ever really happened.

I felt she was in denial.

I said I was sure that it did happen.
I had seen the photographs.
I had heard the testimonies from survivors.
I had witnessed the collective guilt.

I said it still happens.
I said that her own government is involved in much of it.
I said her own son was going to serve in the military that commits it.
I claimed that if it stopped now, it would stop for all of eternity.
I said we could stop it.

She asked How?.
I said compassion.

2005-07-13

Why am I not you?

Apparently, I am not the first one to ask this questions, but I think I have some interesting thought experiments that may shed light on this.

Consider that someone drugs you so that you become unconscious, makes a clone of you, and places the two of you in a symmetric room. Would you know that you were the original and not the clone?

Let us first take a classical physicalist approach. In this conception, every conscious reality must be reflected in a neural structure. Note that since you are exact physical clones, all of your neurons are clones, hence all of your memories must be exactly the same. Therefore, you must admit that you could just as easily be the clone as the original "you". Have you lost consciousness with your loss of confidence in your reality? In a sense you have, because consciousness is an awareness of how one relates to the rest of reality. You are faced with the apparent reality of cloning, so the very existence of this technology means that it may in fact be the case that both of you were cloned and the original is elsewhere! In fact, you may be a couple of clones among millions! To insist that you are the original would not only be illogical, but only result in the clone insisting the same because indentical physical systems must evolve identically.

Now let us approach the problem more quantum mechanically. If you create a clone of me, it would also be theoretically possible that we were placed in a superposition of states. Our very interactions would then make us consider ourselves as parts of the same physical system.

Clearly, consciousness involves physical interactions and correlations. For you to be conscious of something there must be a physical interaction between your sensory neurons and me (usually mediated by photons, but also be acoustic waves, touch, etc.) If we were to interact frequently, the distinction between you and me, would become less relevant, like the distinction between our many facets of ourselves (intellectual, volitional, etc). So this is the solution to part of the mystery. "I" is a myth of a unified self from many interacting neural structures. Conflict per se does not exist for neurons, rather thought results from inhibition and reinforcement. Education consists of external inhibition and reinforcement (carrot and stick) as well as providing the means for self-driven inhibition and reinforcement in a sensorial challenging, but safe environment. This is how sensory inputs are translated into actions. If "I" is fundamentally a myth, then "you" is also a myth. Both I and you, however, are heuristic categories whose utility comes from the fact that the neural and other components of the physical "you" are frequently interacting, and the same for me.

Every individual becomes dependent on his components and frequently depression resultS from losing a component of self, if one is aware that such a loss occurred.

2005-06-08

Do not believe in something simply because you have heard it or because it has been handed down for many generations, or because it is found written in your religious books, or merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Only believe after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason, and is conducive to the good and benefit of all, accept it, and live up to it.
- Buddha

Our reason is our best guide to what is true. Authorities usually repeat what they were taught and frequently do not even believe what they profess. I would modify the statement:
Do not believe something simply because you heard it, or because it is written, or because it was handed down for many generations, or because of the authority of its proponent. Believe something only when, after observation, and critical analysis, you find that it agrees with your reason and your cosmology, and make all beliefs tentative, pending further evidence and thought.

-SCM

2005-05-13

The Golden Rule Across the World's Religions

Native Spirituality


We are as much alive as we keep the earth alive.
-- Chief Dan George

Baha'i Faith


Lay not on any soul a load that you would not wish to be laid upon you, and desire not for anyone the things you would not desire for yourself.
-- Baha'u'llah, Gleanings

Buddhism


Treat not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful.
-- The Buddha, Udana-Varga 5.1

Christianity


In everything, do to others as you would have them do to you; for this is the law and the prophets.
-- Jesus, Matthew 7:12

Confucianism


One word which sums up the basis of all good conduct....loving-kindness. Do not do to others what you do not want done to yourself.
-- Confucius, Analects 15.23
Treat your inferiors as you would want your superiors to treat you.
-- Confucius

Hinduism


This is the sum of duty: do not do to others what would cause pain if done to you.
-- Mahabharata 5:1517

Islam


Not one of you truly believes until you wish for others what you wish for yourself.
-- The Prophet Muhammad, 13th of the 40 Hadiths of Nawawi

Jainism



One should treat all creatures in the world as one would like to be treated.
-- Mahavira, Sutrakritanga

Judaism



What is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbour. This is the whole Torah; all the rest is commentary. Go and learn it.
-- Hillel, Talmud, Shabbath 31a

Sikhism


I am a stranger to no one; and no one is a stranger to me. Indeed, I am a friend to all.
-- Guru Granth Sahib, pg. 1299

Taoism


Regard your neighbour's gain as your own gain and your neighbour's loss as your own loss.
-- Lao Tzu, T'ai Shang Kan Ying P'ien, 213-218

Unitarianism



We affirm and promote respect for the interdependent web of all existence.


Print or electronic reproductions must include the following notice:
Guidelines for a Golden Rule Workshop
Copyright © Paul McKenna 2002
Posters and Guidelines available from Conexus Multifaith Media
www.conexuspress.com / tel. 1-877-784-7779